Log In to see all boards

Author Topic: Controversial plate  (Read 79 times)

Stobaksov

  • New member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Controversial plate
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2018, 10:35:33 PM »
Thank you everybody!

konniela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Controversial plate
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2018, 07:00:33 PM »
The mark say : Da Qing Qianlong Nian Zhi, but it is not from the period of Qianlong.
The other three signs say : Made in Macau. I can not read chinese, but I found this kind of mark on gotheborg


Stobaksov

  • New member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Controversial plate
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2018, 06:06:38 PM »
And what is written on the mark?

Stobaksov

  • New member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Controversial plate
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2018, 12:42:54 PM »
Thank you for your opinion.

heavenguy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 627
Re: Controversial plate
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2018, 09:44:44 AM »
This plate is really really modern.

konniela

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Controversial plate
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2018, 06:02:34 AM »
Looks modern to me, decoration and mark. I dont`t think, that this plate can be from republic period. I have seen similar marks from 1970, also on pieces from macau. 

Stobaksov

  • New member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Controversial plate
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2018, 03:24:25 AM »
Hi, I'm not asking for myself. One person claims that this plate is 98 years old. I disagree. If you have time, please tell me who is right.